What is wrong? Yesterday, the Humane Society cabbage tossed retail sale of a parka with faux fur , which, surprise, surprise, actually contain only the original. Now the company apologizes and says that outer layer is a retailer and did not know I was violating its strict "no skin".
Less than 100 people have the parka, the raccoon dog fur lining contain purchased (Note: the raccoon dog is not a type of raccoon dog ... or, for that matter) to Kohls.com, before the company realized the mistake and pulled the list . According to a release, the sellers who sell their products through Kohl be sure that your clothes free from animal hides, unless such use is expressly authorized by Kohl. The company added that each buy, the jacket can return it no questions asked.
Kohl has encountered this problem before - even a handbag advertised as "wrong" in December last year, revealed to the actual use of rabbit fur. After the consumer, there is a law called true labeling of fur products, which prohibits specifically the sale of real fur as false replacement (or vice versa).
So who's to blame? The statement points the finger at carbon sellers who never told that the product contains real fur. Read the full text of the statement below:
In other news, carbon is the occupation of up to 67,000 seasonal jobs in holiday homes.Suppliers Usage carbon standards require that all goods must be free of any real animal fur, unless expressly authorized in writing by carbon. No permission is given here. An aware that the product with real fur, carbon immediately removed the product from our website instead.
Parkas in question were sold online only and are not on carbon. Carbon not keep these items in our inventory that are sent to the customer directly from the supplier. Less than 100 of these parkas were purchased from cabbage.
We apologize to our customers who would not otherwise have purchased this parka. Carbon honor back, no questions asked, to hold for all customers who do not want to.
No comments:
Post a Comment